Free Web space and hosting from freewebspace.com
Search the Web

 BACK TO SITE PLAN 

C.FREEDOM

Freedom, the first dogmatic slogan written on the flags of all `Republics' is as such a Noumenon, a meaningless, empty noise. The question if I am, or may be free has sense only with respect to a context, to a Referential. This context is more or less strongly ordered with the basic Orderer Causality which has two aspects Effectivity and Finality. Only Finality is pertinent to Freedom. I'm certainly not free to act in any way on past events. Once I have kicked a dog, there is no way I may unkick it. Finality accounts for all our acts, from most important, like deciding a world war to most trivial like getting out of bed in the morning. Even science while investigating Effectivity for factual evidence, reposes itself entirely in Finality, when conceiving its Axioms and Theorems, or planning its experiments. After these preliminaries let's move to Freedom itself. As we have seen in previous chapters, Freedom is the inverse aspect of Order: highly ordered systems have few degrees of Freedom, chaotic ones have high, innumerable amount of them. For a human being, the Freedom degrees of his context represent options of his choice. Thus, on the face of it, I am less free within highly ordered context than within a less ordered my Freedom becoming illimited within the chaos. However, under closer examination the problem appears more complex. Let's consider the highway code. It's a highly ordered system. It forbids me to drive on the left, to cross continuous line and red lights, etc. In return it leaves one Freedom degree open: the option to drive. Similarly, all social systems are ordered by some code which blocks most of rights, leaving open only very few. Thus, any social system may be considered allegorically as a "prison". Yet, perhaps a social system guaranteeing all rights, without restricting anything would allow us to escape from all prisons and to be entirely free? Well, let's imagine the system "Road" without highway code, a chaotic system with unrestricted Freedom. After having evaded some trucks driving on the left and one or two cars cutting in through red lights, one will stop at the road side amazed to be still alive. Driving became impossible. Newly opened rights act as obstacles blocking the essential Freedom to drive. And if you cannot drive, what is the use of the newly acquired Freedom to drive on the left? Paradoxically, a chaotic system by opening too much Freedom kills it entirely. Chaos, the absolute Freedom results in noFreedom at all. A totally free system becomes the strictest prison. In this light Order appears as "Freedom-to" granted by "Freedom-from". Order emerges from chaos by closing most of hindering Freedom degrees and leaving open only a few. In case they coincide with my desires I consider the system as a "good prison", otherwise as a bad one. In a good prison I am FREE FROM hindrances and FREE TO perform desired actions efficiently. Ordered road grants me FREEDOM TO drive efficiently by granting the FREEDOM FROM stress and danger. Order stimulates efficiency and chaos paralyzes it. One can accomplish something only within an ordered context. Illusory absolute Freedom of chaos and restricted, but real Freedom of order are beautifully contrasted in Faulkner's novellas "The Wild Palms" and "Old Man". In "The Wild Palms" Harry motivated by love refuses all rules and conventions, goes down all steps of the social ladder and finishes by killing Charlotte, the very object of his love for whose sake he had claimed this absolute Freedom. In "Old Man" the Tall Convict executes orders of prison guard and battles the great Mississippi flood to save a pregnant woman. Free to stay out he returns spontaneously to prison to regain the specific Freedom of his destiny. The only Freedom we have is Freedom to choose a prison like the Tall Convict did. Finality may be seen as a project encompassing some potential options each of which may be chosen and converted into active Final Cause. Faced with these options I may chose some or none. However, refusal to chose is a particular choice, a decision committing the future, so I am bound to exert my Freedom. We are not only free, we are sentenced to Freedom.